Free Tool · Indicative Estimate

Risk Snapshot

An indicative estimate of your annual cyber loss exposure
— built on FAIR, run in your browser, ready in 60 seconds.

10K Monte Carlo Iterations
Data Stays In Your Browser
The Tool

Five inputs.
One indicative number.

Self-assess your organisation and choose a cyber scenario. The engine runs 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations using pre-calibrated PERT distributions derived from Cyentia IRIS, Verizon DBIR, IBM Cost of a Data Breach and OAIC Notifiable Data Breaches — and returns an indicative Annualised Loss Expectancy with a full loss exceedance curve.

01 · Organisation
02 · Data exposure & scenario
03 · NIST CSF Implementation Tiers
Tier 1
Partial
Risk management is not formalised; cybersecurity activity is ad-hoc and reactive. Limited organisational awareness.
Tier 2
Risk Informed
Management-approved practices, but not established as organisation-wide policy. Awareness exists; prioritisation is inconsistent.
Tier 3
Repeatable
Formally approved policy, regularly updated based on changes in business requirements and threat landscape.
Tier 4
Adaptive
Practices adapted from lessons learned and predictive indicators. Continuous improvement embedded in culture.
Identity & Access
T2 · Risk Informed
Data Protection
T2 · Risk Informed
Incident Response
T2 · Risk Informed

Calculations run locally in your browser. No inputs are transmitted or stored.

Estimated Annualised Loss Exposure
Mean (ALE)
Median P50
P90
Tail P99
Loss Exceedance Curve

Probability your annual loss
exceeds a given threshold.

Read the curve left-to-right: the further right a point sits, the larger the potential loss; the vertical axis shows how likely it is to be exceeded in any given year.

Peer Comparison

Where your posture sits
against NIST CSF benchmarks.

Same scenario and organisation profile, modelled at Tier 2 (typical APRA-regulated peer) and Tier 4 (leading peer). The gap between your bar and the others is the value at stake in the maturity uplift conversation.

Indicative only.
Not for board reporting.

This snapshot uses pre-baked PERT distributions derived from public sources (Cyentia IRIS, Verizon DBIR, IBM Cost of a Data Breach, OAIC Notifiable Data Breaches) and a coarse NIST CSF Implementation Tier adjustment on vulnerability. It is deliberately simple.

It is not calibrated to your specific environment, control landscape, threat exposure, third-party risk posture, or APRA CPS 230 / CPS 234 obligations. It does not replace SME elicitation, it does not run the full Razata control efficacy model, and its outputs are not suitable for board reporting or regulatory submission.

For a board-grade quantification, the paid Razata CRQ engine runs 100,000 simulations across multi-scenario portfolios with SME-calibrated inputs, full control efficacy modelling, and mapping to APRA CPS 230 / CPS 234, NCA ECC-2:2024, SAMA CSF, and SOCI Act obligations.

Start the
conversation

Ready for the calibrated version, or have questions about the snapshot? Reach out and we'll route your enquiry to the right team.

contact@razata.org
FAIR™ Certified APRA CPS 230 & 234 NCA CSCC AWS Solutions Architect ISO 27001 Board Reporting Ready